• Currently /5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
November 7th, 2005

Recording from inside a parked car of rain falling on the roof. The car
was parked under a large tree resulting in very large drops hitting the
roof & creating loud impacts with a slight metal resonance from the


  • avatar
    captainswingarm 9 years, 6 months ago

    OK, so I admit to not having looked at the specs before having a rant I was tired late at night and the sample I needed was a hassle to use - it's not another lossy codec - but that wasn't actually the point of my rant: Firstly, 44.1KHz PCM is lossy already and seondly that the reduction of data by .flac is not that much greater than a .wav zipped up. .flac like a zip for PCM audio. It produces sample-perfect reproductions with a reduced overall data bulk. It's essentially like running an audio file straight from a zip. But the reduction is only a few percent more than zipping it anyway - so what's the point? There's tons or archiving software around that everyone has, using the .zip formats and others. Why introduce another to squash a 10Mb file down to 7Mb instead of 8Mb. And as it's still got to be converted into a useable format for mainstream audio software I really don't see the point. Finally, since a 192kbps mp3 is damn good quality anyway why not just use that as the smaller dowload? I don't see the point in having this third format that is basically just a zip, but requires extra software to decode it witha minimal storage gain.
    Basically there reason for this rant is that as a pro-tools user, PT steal all the hardware resources. To previes tracks in freesound I have to quit Pro-Tools, so what I do is dowload a lot of files then audtion them in Pro-Tools. I can't do this with .flacs - I have to close my session, open up some third sound editor just for that purpose and voncert them, whereas I could unzip them straight from the PT dialogue. If there was a decoder for .flac that would decrypt the data into the folder from the right-click menu and thus in my PT dialogue then I would have no problem with it.

  • avatar
    Bram 9 years, 6 months ago

    *sigh* what ignorance. captainswarming, flac *is* lossless. Please read:



    If lossless compression doesn't exist, then explain me how ZIP works? :-)

  • avatar
    captainswingarm 9 years, 6 months ago

    flac is not lossless. It just sounds a bit less lossy compared to compression methods. Compression is achieved by removing data. Even .wav are lossy - everything over 22KHz is discarded. I personally can't hear the difference between a high bit-rate mp3 and a flac, and since all major audio software supports mp3 but not flac, i don't see the need for it. Why use Audition when I've paid for Sound Forge and Pro Tools? I'm all for open-source and free-ness, but I'm also for ease of use. I don't need yet another piece of software to deal with yet another file format (like matroska - grr!)

  • avatar
    dobroide 9 years, 7 months ago

    Hey, Flac files are lossless and half as bulky as wav. Converting them back to wav is *very* easy, just search a bit around. There exists also a plugin to load flac directly into Audition, and it's great!

  • avatar
    captainswingarm 9 years, 7 months ago

    ... so no-one can use it. If you can't use it in sound forge, pro-tools or logic, I don't really see the point. It's not even a compressed format. A wav wouldn't be much larger and everyone could use it. Still... nice recording.

Please log in to comment

Flac (.flac)
4.6 MB
44100.0 Hz
16 bit
Sound illegal or offensive? Flag it!